We’ll call her Mrs. Smith. She teaches music in Peekskill,
New York. I contacted Mrs. Smith through a mutual friend in the area, and she
agreed to talk with me about her district. Not surprisingly, Mrs. Smith has
heard little about NETS, so I sent her a link to iste.org and began my
interview.
I started by asking Mrs. Smith about the use of technology
in her own classroom. Did she know if her school met any of the NETS standards
without realizing it? Surprisingly, she had. Several years ago, her school
began a program using Garage Band – a computer program by Apple which allows
users to record, mix, and compose their own music using existing sound samples,
MIDI interfaces, or live recording. Although she did not teach that particular
class herself, she was familiar enough
with it to elaborate.
Students at her school are offered the chance to use Garage
Band as a “general music” class as an optional replacement for traditional
performance classes such as choir or band. The students begin by learning the
basics of sound mixing, using the sound samples provided with the software.
They are taught to copy, paste, loop, master, mix, and equalize each of the
tracks within the interface. Over the course of the class, the students also
learn how to input new sounds into the computer through a MIDI interface, as
well as basic recording techniques for live musicians. Their final project is
to create a 3 minute audio recording using looped samples, MIDI input, and a
recorded vocal track – either sung or spoken.
When I asked Mrs. Smith about the rest of the school, she
had no idea. As a “special area” teacher, she explained that there was a
disconnect between her department and the rest of the school. In part, this was
based on pull-out lessons, and the stress this put on other core subject
teachers in math and English.
It’s not surprising to me that NETS is an unfamiliar area
for music teachers. Technology has only recently become affordable enough to
become useful in the subject area. Prior to the availability of inexpensive
technology like digital recording, classes like this would be unthinkable.
Hardware alone would take up an entire room, not to mention the expense. The fact that music technology has finally
progressed enough to exist on a home computer is what allows these standards to
even be approached today.
It’s hard to imagine, given the current social trends, that
technology would not be considered an important tool, even in music education.
And the speed at which technology progresses strongly implies that there should
be little trouble bringing up these standards with administrators. In fact, I
would assume that by the time I graduate and get a teaching job, schools should
have at least started to address the NETS-S and NETS-T standards. This is only
speculation though.
To be honest, as interesting it was to speak with a teacher
about this, I think it would have been far more interesting to interview an
administrator. I would assume they would have a far better understanding on how
their school was functioning under this standards over several departments.
Its uplifting to find out that technology is being authentically used in a subject area that is often dismissed as non-essential. I found it fascinating how this computerized audio-design program was able to open the door for an entirely new course to be offered. I am personally not 100% familiar with all the features & functions that were attributed to this software, however I believe that if it effectively equips students with keen knowledge & skills in relation to the aspects of music/voice recording, it is certainly worth it. The access to modern hi-tech resources that this school is granting to its students is unquestionably placing them in a significantly advantageous position for college & future careers. I was slightly upset however that the school described in this post is not a New Jersey school.
ReplyDeleteBryan, what do you believe will be the greatest difficulty/hindrance to integrating the NETS-S into your lessons?
ReplyDelete