Wednesday, May 2, 2012

Final Post


This lesson plan is designed to tackle several areas of music appreciation. The class should have already be fluent in standard notation and have discussed the many elements of baroque music, such as voice leading, counterpoint, cadences, non-chord tones.

Row 1: Access

To begin, the lesson focuses on class discussion on the nature of the composing in the Baroque era and the potential difficulties of mass producing music without the aid of modern technology or printing presses, specifically addressing the monotony involved with creating both a conductors score which covers all the parts of the composition, as well as the scribing of each individual parts while also accounting for clef changes and transpositions. (NJCCCS 1.4.8.A.7 Analyze the form, function, craftsmanship, and originality of representative works of dance, music, theatre, and visual art.)


Row 2: Analyze

The students are encouraged to work in groups as they navigate a nearly blank Bach Chorale. Supplied for the students is a chorale worksheet on Sibelius for them to fill in. Most of the chords in the chorale have been left blank, leaving ample room for innovation on behalf of the students, and ensuring that each student or group creates a composition that is fully unique in its own right. (1.1.5.B.2 Demonstrate the basic concepts of meter, rhythm, tonality, intervals, chords, and melodic and harmonic progressions, and differentiate basic structures.NET-S 2.D contribute to project teams to produce original works or solve problems. 1.1.8.B.1 Analyze the application of the elements of music in diverse Western and non-Western musical works from different historical eras using active listening and by reading and interpreting written scores.NETS-S 6.A understand and use technology systems. NETS-S 6.B select and use applications effectively and productively.)


Row 3: Produce

Following the completion of the chorale, the students will be asked to open a new score. This new score will be set up for a string quartet. The class will again discuss how Bach primarily wrote for keyboard then individually transcribed his compositions for other instruments. As a class, we will do the same – however, we will be aided by modern technology. (1.1.12. B.2 Synthesize knowledge of the elements of music in the deconstruction and performance of complex musical scores from diverse cultural contexts. NET-S 1.B Create original works as a means of personal or group expression. NET-S 2.A interact, collaborate, and publish with peers, experts, or others employing a variety of digital environments and media. NETS-S 2.D contribute to project teams to produce original works or solve problems. NETS-S 6.A understand and use technology systems. NETS-S 6.B select and use applications effectively and productively.)


Row 4: Communicate

Finally, each group/individual will create one final score: a Wind ensemble of their design containing 4 instruments. The students will copy their previous parts to these new systems, creating their own arrangement of the Chorale. Using the playback feature of Sibelius, each group/individual will play their arrangement for the class and explain their choices for musical instruments. (1.4.8.B.1 Evaluate the effectiveness of a work of art by differentiating between the artist’s technical proficiency and the work’s content or form.)

I admit that I struggled with this assignment. Music is an odd subject in school. It already uses some technology (the instruments themselves) and focuses on self-reflection and improvement. It is, in a sense, a course on philosophy. For the overwhelming majority, music will not be the primary focus of their careers. Rather, the lessons learned in music must overreach into life lessons for the class to maintain its educational value, and music innately accomplishes this. The focus on self-improvement and active observation branches into every aspect of professionalism, and technology is not the greatest tool to accomplish this goal. At the same time, the availability of the internet and other digital technology makes it far more possible to self-educate in a way never seen before in human history.  For the music teacher, this leaves very few technologies which lend themselves to the smaller focus of music. Additionally, many of these existing technologies are very expensive, and compete in the school budget against more fundamental costs such as new instruments, uniforms, annual repairs, competition entrance fees, etc… With budgets stretched as thin as they are, the only way  the most beneficial programs are chosen is by their expense – Making it highly unlikely that many schools will have full access.

Online Classes... Are Bad!

And that's not a slight against the professors (I can haz gud grade?) It's just research. The impersonal nature of the courses detract from their content. Moreover, they lack the personal connection between students. Think about it. How much easier is it to insult someone online? Why is the internet the hot button on issues like cyber-bullying and scandal? It's not just how unbelievably impersonal it is, it's also because we don't tend to view people (especially those we haven't personally met) as people. We view them as extensions of their avatars, we  REMIND ourselves that they are real, rather than vice versa.

It's not surprising that the issues about the internet in education are so hotly contested. It's obviosly a great tool to improve access to higher education.The ease and degree in which information can be spread via the web is virtually infinite. But what is lost? And is that altruism the only factor? What is the different between being taught by an "invisible" professor over a well programmed AI bot?

Well, what IS the difference between a teacher and an AI bot? The obvious answer is that there IS a professor guiding the class, and there is access to that professor. Also, at allows subjectivity and feedback from assessment forms. But that fact that the professor is not "present" in an online course has loads of implications.

For one, the classes have a much, much higher failure rate than traditional courses. But moreover, good education requires dialogue between class and teacher. This is severely diminished in an online course, unless that course is taught via Skype or other streaming video where there is a formal schedule. Even then, the the back and forth that spurs debate and discussion is forced to the backseat in favor of much more one-sided education. Education that, if we follow what we have been taught in the Education department of Montclair State University, is severely diminished. Online education, by nature of its social disconnect, is content driven. It becomes, in my opinion, a glorified lecture series without the benefit of seeing the expression of the lecturer's face, or interpreting their vocal inflections.

Is altruism the main reason for online education? I would argue no. And my evidence is your bill (which you can find by logging in here). The university does not have to pay for the electricity of your home computer. There is no "class size limit" set by a fire code. No classroom to maintain. No overhead to pay, other than the salaries of the professors and the tech crew that already maintain the MSU Website. No parking lot or dorm rooms needed to cater toward the needs of students. It is unquestionably cheaper to teach online than in a classroom. So why then is the class the same price as a "traditional" classroom course? The answer is of course, the profit motive. An entire dissertation could be written as to the ethics of the profit motive in education, so I will leave that to be debated. Perhaps here! (leave a comment!)

This is not a slight against this professor. I just wanted to close the semester with a debate on something I'm sure many of us were thinking. I just wanted to open the door and provide some information regarding the continued debate as to the benefits and ethics of online education.

Personally, I would never want to teach an online course. I feel as if it would relegate me to a position as lecturer, curriculum designer, and professional grader. A teacher is much, much more than that.



http://www.mindingthecampus.com/originals/2011/12/the_many_problems_of_online_ed.html

School in Norway - #1 in the world

In the US, cumpulsory schooling starts at between ages 5 and 8 (depending on state) and continues to ages 16-18 (again, depending on state). Norway starts a age 6 and ends at age 16 nationally, and leads the world rankings. But why? Is there a "magic bullet" to fix American education? Not according to them! It's a process that starts with a national commitment to education, and teacher autonomy. Did I mention Norway is 100% unionized?

http://www.regjeringen.no/en/dep/kd/Selected-topics/compulsory-education/the-norwegian-education-system.html?id=445118

My summer project: Custom Music Ed Wiki!

So a friend of mine pointed me to this site where you can create your own custom wiki. How fantastic is that as a resource for education? I have nothing more to say other than, take a look and abuse this resource!

http://www.wikispaces.com/

Wikipedia as a source

So we all use it. Our professors use it. why is wikipedia still taboo in education? Understandably it is not a scholarly source for your doctoral dissertation, but for the average assignment, why is this tool still so looked down upon?

http://digitalscholarship.wordpress.com/2008/09/01/is-wikipedia-becoming-a-respectable-academic-source/

"Ranking teachers"

http://www.nytimes.com/schoolbook/2012/02/24/teacher-data-reports-are-released

So these were released. The state evaluations on teachers were made public despite many thinking it was a terrible idea to release them. Why would you not want to release data? Is it because it undermines the collaborative nature of teaching? Is it because creating competition between teachers is a bad thing for students? Nah. It's because the results of the rankings have a margin of error between 33% and 53%! Fifty-three percent.

That's not even in the ballpark of accurate. Yet, they're still released, and the plan is still to use these numbers as a basis to develop merit pay. Can anyone tell me on what planet this makes sense?

"Accountability"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6XAPnuFjJc&feature=relmfu

This is another RSA animate discussing the research about merit pay. It's more than worth a look. The simple fact that we see more and more pushed for this paradigm is incredible.